Montag, 30. November 2009

englisch und so

How do genetics influence our lives?

Have you ever imagined being cloned, for health purpose or some other reason? For most this is a scaring imagination, but already in a while, this will be possible to do. The researches based on genetics made a huge progress in the past few years.

There is already a huge amount of genetic manipulation around us, we just don’t know. The creation of gene-food has become an important issue. While some people believe, this ain’t natural any more and neglect it, some think just the best of it. Supporters argue, that those for example gene-manipulated plants are far more resistant than the natural ones, what they are not considering, is the possibility that this creation might spread and also replace the natural one, which causes its extinction.
Also, the question of cloning is a moral one. Shall we really be able to use clones – living beings, just like we are – as living organ depots?
The biometrics can be useful, as long as they are used for safety reasons only. But when the government starts to take fingerprints and DNA of everyone, this would be nothing but contra productive and grant the government control over the whole state.

Scientific progress is something to judge about carefully. On the one hand, this can be very helpful to heal, to explore etc…, on the other hand this can destroy and kill as the atomic researches have shown with the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima in 1945.

Sonntag, 4. Oktober 2009

Ideal Family

The shape of traditional families have changed ever since. The todays traditional family, consisting of a man a woman and approximately 2,1 children. But be serious, who does really have 2,1 children? In my opinion love and understanding counts, rather than size and setup. In the following essay I'll explain why.

When talking about families, people often mean the traditional family. what is ideal changes from individual to individual. In contrast to that, one thing doesn't change - everyone wants love, everyone wants to be understood. Why would you want to have a traditional family, which is always fighting? Of course there's also fights in non-tradtional families as well, but size and shape is of no importance when it comes to understanding.
When it comes to the relationship between family members you often hear people saying that they wouldn't want all the fighting at all. In my opinion that is far beyond ideal. I mean, what is more human than fighting? The key to this is called "balance" - balance between loving and fighting.
Society cares a lot about shapes and sizes, for example in China: people are not allowed to have more than one child, unless they pay certain taxes. Another example is, that gay-families don't have the social status they deserve. I think my thought of an ideal family is way more valuable than just certain setups. Not rarely children of aggressive and also violent parents tend to be aggressive and violent in the future. Roll models influence the social behaviour of children more than the family setup. Furthermore parents are the most important roll models for children, if there's a lot of fighting at home, what else should children learn but fighting from that?

To sum up, in my opinion it's not important wheter shape or size is close to the statistical traditional family its rather the atmosphere inside the family. It doesn't matter if you are gay or straight. It doesn't matter how many children you raise. It doesn't matter of which race you are, as long as you do your best to create the most harmonic atmosphere possible.

Sonntag, 8. Februar 2009

Summary - Virgins

(Samuel )
The story is about a modern, dysfunctional family, which consists of 4 members. Suzy, who is the head of the family, is very busy doing work during the weeks and cold at weekends. Nick is a househusband, who keeps the house on his own. Jack and Zoe are the two children of Suzy and Nick. Jack appears to be full of life and spontaneous while Zoe is more calm and thoughtful. The closer the story is to its peak the more conflicts are noticeable. For example there’s one caused by Zoe. She tells Jack’s secret to Nick, although she had promised not to tell anyone. The arguing of Jack and Nick is inescapable and at its end Jack runs off. In the end of the story, however, everything is fine again.

(Markus)
In this play you see a huge black curtain in the background, which is used as hiding place for clothes, items like cell phones etc. and the characters if they are not mentioned in the scene. There are also some walls right in front of the curtain so the characters can hide behind the curtain without taking the attention of the main characters. In the middle of the stage is a dollhouse, which is used for sitting by Jack and for window cleaning by Nick. The last things I remember are some boxes. These boxes have multiple uses such as seats or the characters stand on them so the audience can see them better.

(Robert)
This play conveys various messages, such as not to do drugs, because you might lose control of yourself. In addition it’s not too smart to have sex without using a condom. Furthermore the handling of sexual diseases is an important topic too. All of these aspects make the play a good one, which we can recommend you without having a bad conscience.

Dienstag, 27. Januar 2009

Shut up

Group work about “Shut Up“
Chorus:
Although they tried they weren’t able to control their relationship.
Stanza [2]
At first everything went alright. They go out together. From the man’s point of view everything is fine, but the woman thinks she gets too few of his attention.
Stanza [3]
It’s too tough for them to keep up their relationship, because it’s based on xxx (the correct word will be added tomorrow prolly, as I can't read my own letters right now). He doesn’t listen to her. They are arguing every day.
Stanza [4]
The man wants to start their relation anew. But the woman thinks that he is not good enough for her.
a co-work of Sam and Markus

Sonntag, 11. Januar 2009

summary - paranoid park

The book "Paranoid Park" was written by the novelist Blake Nelson. This book was released in 2008 and published by Puffin.

The story takes place in Oregon state, part of the United States of America. The narrator, who is the main character, is 16 years old and a fascinated skater. There's a very famous skate park in the city he inhabits. One evening he decides to go there by himself - his friend went to see some girl. At this evening he get to know a streeter called Scratch. Scratch tempts the narrator to hop a train. "Just for fun. It's a shortcut", he says. While riding the train, they are seen by a security guard, who immidiately chases them and starts to hit Scratch. The fight ends tragically.

From this point on the narrator has to deal with a bunch mixed feelings. He feels guilty and almost confesses. The fear to be imprisoned, however, is greater than his will of confession. You gain a deep insight of the feelings, which the main character lives through. Blake Nelson is very talented when it comes to describing emotions. The further advanced the story is, the more exciting it is.

This book is a good example of how books should be. A good book is characterized by the fact that you don't want to stop reading until you are done. The book made me grin after reading and I thought that it's a pity that it's already over. I like the style Nelson writes. It's clear and understandable, even for children. I recommend this book to people of any age, who are interested in exciting stories. It's one of the best books we had to read for school so far.
Thank you - Blake Nelson.

Freitag, 6. Juni 2008

Rifiu of sö buk spik

The book „Speak“ was written by the novelist Laurie Halse Anderson, who was born in 1961 in the USA and lives now in New York. There was a number of awards, which she gained through Speak.

Melinda Sordino, who’s 14 years old, decided to spend the evening together with her friends at a party. Everything was perfect until something disastrous happened, which made her phone the cops.

Melinda’s appearance is shy, coy and she’s not able to speak out what she’s on her mind.

She spent the last weeks of her vacancies reclusively. When school starts again she’s nobody to talk, because her friends tergiversated from her. Melinda’s an OUTCAST. She’s suffering from her loneliness until she meets Heather, who’s new at the High-School as well. Unfortunately it wasn’t a too long friendship.

Her reclusiveness rose and rose until she didn’t even speak a word. There were not many enjoyments left in her life, but one of those was art. She was good at drawing

After a while she took heart to tell her ex-best friend about the happening of the party-evening. As she told (wrote) her that she was raped by Rachel’s boyfriend, she didn’t believe her. Anyway, the information spread in speed of light, and she could finally speak again, which made this end a happy end (ina way :P)

Gosh darn it... Have I really been so innocent to believe this book was kind of exciting? I mean 200 pages, which could be explained in about 5 words. Though the story is topical it’s boring. There were moments I could hardly stay awake.

Additional Comment (not belonging to the text)

If I hadn’t paid for this book I’d have put this book onto a bonfire… I mean I’d have slammed it onto a bonfire. But well duty is duty

Ofc you can’t always get books you like (never had the luck though)… Hope you enjoyed reading xD

discribe the main character-with regard to xD

Melinda was, before she called the cops, kind of a popular pupil and very confident. She belonged to a clan and had a lot of friends, but this is a thing of the past. After she had phoned the police because she was raped the world has changed a lot for her. She became an Outcast, she spent the remaining holidays in her house, she didn’t go swimming or anything else-she just avoided any human contact. Then High-school begins and all of her ex-friends let her know, that she’s undesired in the new clans. But then Heather, who was new there, joined her.

Her mom and her dad aren’t too caring. They just don’t talk enough with their child. My impression is that she feels disregarded. She’s only a few people left who she could call friends. There’s Heather, who cancels the friendship, and there’s her lab partner, who was named David Pertaki and last but not least her art teacher Mister Freeman. Mister Freeman is a very sensitive man, she feels kind of secure when she’s close to him. Her connection to the other teachers isn’t that good. In fact she hates her history teacher. He’s making a problem out of everything. Her English teacher, who’s called hair-woman by Melinda, is weird.

The most pupils on her school don’t like her. Whether they hate her or not why do people at the age of 14-18 throw around balls of mashed potatoes, I found that part a bit unrealistic. For some reason I think even teachers hate her. Rachel and her other ex-friends see her a bit different than the other pupil, for them it’s not just about dislike it is about hate and anger. Although her parents don’t have too much time to spend with her they love her.

The change was enormous. At the beginning she was shy, reserved but she talked. The near the story is at the peak the less she’s talking to anyone. But after she took the heart to talk to Rachel, her ex-best friend, about the happening positive changes were noticeable.

The End